Saturday, October 25, 2014
Breaking News

Russian Low-Observable/Stealth Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (and Possibly Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles?) Under Development: What it Means for Future Warfare and Geopolitics

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link
pf button both Russian Low Observable/Stealth Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (and Possibly Anti Ship Cruise Missiles?) Under Development: What it Means for Future Warfare and Geopolitics

By David Crane
david (at) defensereview (dot) com

The following article is property of DefenseReview.com (DR) and is copyrighted material. If you are reading this article on another website other than DefenseReview.com, please email us the website address/URL (where the unauthorized DR article reprint is located) at defrev (at) gmail (dot) com. Thank you.

July 13, 2014

According to a recent Defense One report, Russia’s developing and looking to deploy “radar-evading” low-observable/stealth nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles that could prove to be a serious problem for U.S. ballistic missile defense systems. And, this year, Russia will reportedly deliver RS-24 Yars (NATO reporting name SS-29) MIRV (Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle)-equipped, thermonuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles to its Novosibirsk, Tagil and Kozelsk missile units, further complicating the U.S.’ short-term ballistic missile defense capability outlook.

Now, while DefenseReview (DR) isn’t really worried about Russia launching a ballistic missile attack on the U.S. in the short term, or even the long term for that matter, it provides a really problematic future picture for the United States geopolitically, and here’s why: The Russians have been a bunch of busy little beavers over there, upgrading pretty much all their military defense tech, including fighter aircraft and infantry warfighter tech, including weapons and body armor. And, we know from recent events in the Ukraine, that 1) Russia’s rather adept at fast strategic and tactical infantry deployment into neighboring countries, and 2) Vladimir Putin has proven to be rather deliberate in his decision-making when it comes to Russian military operations.

Anyway, it’s Russia’s combined strategic and tactical military forces that will cause us problems, since it will make conventional warfare significantly more difficult to wage against them. Their upgraded conventional military capabilities will be harder to combat if it comes to it, and the specter of their improved, low-observabe/stealth nuclear missile (and aircraft) arsenal will make NATO forces more hesitant to even want to combat them, for fear of conflict escalation.

Oh, and it gets worse. Lately, there’s been some good ol’ Sino-Russian military colaberation/cooperation that doesn’t exactly bode well for the future. If World War III ever breaks out, God forbid, the United States and the rest of NATO must assume that it will have to contend with a Sino-Russian combined military force. The martial assistance of Germany, England, France and Japan (and hopefully India), will be crucial, if/when this occurs.

One must also assume that Russia won’t stop with “stealthifying” its ballistic missiles and combat aircraft. What about subsonic and supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles to better combat our aircraft carriers? It would seem only logical that the Russians would want to make those low-observable/stealthy as well, and that’s not exactly good news for U.S. aircraft carriers. The Chinese already have a rather disturbing anti-aircraft carrier solution with the DF-21D ASBM (Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile), some interesting electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and high-powered microwave (HPM) weapons (including “Assassin’s Mace”), and their own 5th-generation low-observable/stealth fighter jet aircraft under development called the Chengdu J-20, their counterpart to the 5th-gen Russian PAK-FA Sukhoi T-50/HAL FGFA.

Finally, Russia and China have large populations of people whose lives they don’t appear to value quite as much as NATO countries do theirs, so when it comes to a war of human attrition, the Sino-Russian unholy alliance will enjoy an advantage there, as well. The Russian government proved in World War II (WWII) that it was will to sacrifice an incredibly large number of its people to beat the Germans. Both before and since that war, the Chinese government’s proven to be pretty uncaring of its own people. One just has to read about the virtual slave labor conditions and other situations in China, even at the manufacturing facilities of major U.S. companies that include children as the victims, to understand this. How much is the Chinese government really going to care about sacrificing their warfighters and civilians in an actual war (and there will be A LOT of Chinese warfighters with which to contend)?. Remember, they’ve got a lot more than we do.

Bottom line, it’s not just about low-observable intercontinental ballistic missiles. It’s about the strategic ramifications of those missiles, the effect they’ll have on every aspect of future warfare and geopolitics with Russia (and possibly China). If Russia can get its missiles past our intercontinental ballistic missile defense shield, the geopolitical and future warfare trickle-down effect will be very real and non-positive for us.

© Copyright 2014 DefenseReview.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without receiving permission and providing proper credit and appropriate links.

Related Articles:

Russian Nano-Armor Coming in 2015 for Future Soldier ‘Warrior Suit’, and Russian Spetsnaz (Military Special Forces) Already Running Improved 6B43 Composite Hard Armor Plates, New Plate Carriers and Combat Helmets, AK Rifle/Carbines, GM-94 Grenade Launchers and other Tactical Gear in Crimea, Ukraine

Chinese Military Developing New Aircraft Carrier Tech: Is a Sino-Russian Economic and Military Alliance in the Works?

Chinese Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) ‘Kill Weapon’ Flummoxes U.S. Navy

Chinese Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) and High-Powered Microwave (HPM) Weapons vs. U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups: Can the U.S. Military Effectively Counter “Assassin’s Mace”?

Gen-2 PAK-FA Sukhoi T-50/HAL FGFA Low-Observable Supercruising 5th-Generation Stealth Fighter Aircraft Begins Flight Testing: Raptorsky Alive and Well

Raptor Beware: Russia Test-Flies PAK FA Sukhoi T-50 5th-Generation Supercruise-Capable Low-Observable/Stealth Fighter Aircraft. Look out F-22.

Russians Getting a New Rifle: New Russian Military Assault Rifle to Replace Aging Kalashnakov 7.62x39mm AK-47/AKM-type AK74M and 5.45x39mm AK-74-type AK-105 Assault Rifles

U.S. Navy Aircraft Carriers Vulnerable to SS-N-27B Sizzler Anti-Ship Missile

U.S. Aircraft Carriers Vulnerable to Attack?: The Ticking Time Bomb

F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Too Expensive? Solution: Scrap the F-35A and F-35C Variants, Produce the F-35B STOVL, and Revive the F-22 Raptor.

F-22 Raptor Program Cancellation: Will we learn from it?

 

Russian Low-Observable/Stealth Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (and Possibly Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles?) Under Development: What it Means for Future Warfare and Geopolitics by
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link

About David Crane

David Crane started publishing online in 2001. Since that time, governments, military organizations, Special Operators (i.e. professional trigger pullers), agencies, and civilian tactical shooters the world over have come to depend on Defense Review as the authoritative source of news and information on "the latest and greatest" in the field of military defense and tactical technology and hardware, including tactical firearms, ammunition, equipment, gear, and training.