Monday, November 24, 2014
Breaking News
The U.S. Army’s Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op-Rod “Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine”-Type AR (AR-15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation?

The U.S. Army’s Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op-Rod “Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine”-Type AR (AR-15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation?

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link
pf button both The U.S. Armys Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op Rod Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine Type AR (AR 15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation?

By David Crane
defrev (at) gmail (dot) com

All photos and some video clips contained in this article were shot by DefenseReview.com (DR), and are copyrighted. DefenseReview.com owns the copyright on these photos and some of these video clips. Ferfrans Specialties and Falcon Security Group (FSG) own the copyright on some videos contained herein. The accompanying photos and video clips shot by DR were shot with a Canon PowerShot S90 10-megapixel digital camera (still camera with video capability).

November 29, 2011

David Crane Fires Colt P0923 APC Advanced Piston Carbine Piston AR Carbine DefenseReview.com DR 1 The U.S. Armys Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op Rod Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine Type AR (AR 15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation? Army Times recently published an article with the somewhat misleading title "Colt, S&W among those out of carbine bidding". The reason it's a bit misleading is that it would appear by author Lance Bacon's (Lance M. Bacon) own admission that Colt's piston AR design is currently still in the running for the the Individual Carbine (IC) program, and DefenseReview (DR) has already heard from U.S. military contacts that Colt's "Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine"/IC concept is the Colt APC (Advanced Piston Carbine) system, now also referred-to as the Advanced Piston System (APS), which utilizes an articulating link piston (ALP) that the company claims "reduces the inherent stress in the piston stroke by allowing for deflection and thermal expansion." .

The Individual Carbine and M4/M4A1 Upgrade/Improvement program constitute the two parts of a "dual-path strategy" for improving on the Colt M4/M4A1 Carbine, either through replacement or upgrade. Ultimately, they'll be pitted against each other in the U.S. military infantry small arms face-off equivalent of "Celebrity Death Match", but Army officials are betting on the IC winning out.

David Crane Running HK416C AR SBR at NDIA Infantry Small Arms Systems Symposium 2011 Range Day Shoot 3 The U.S. Armys Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op Rod Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine Type AR (AR 15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation? Whichever way the Army goes, a gas piston/op-rod (push-type operating rod)-driven AR (AR-15) is the most likely way forward and perhaps the best way forward at this point, since it would theoretically allow for the adoption and fielding of a single AR weapons platform for both U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) and general infantry forces, and both would appear to prefer the AR weapons platform over a non-AR platform like the SCAR platform for a 5.56mm NATO (5.56x45mm NATO) carbine/SBR (Short Barreled Rifle)/sub-carbine or ACR. The AR platform is also completely familiar to general infantry personnel, which is important.

A piston AR would provide SOF personnel with a familiar and highly-ergonomic weapon system that can be fired safely immediately upon coming out of the water during over-the-beach ops and that can be run at higher round count in adverse combat conditions with less cleaning and lubrication vs. a DGI system that cannot be safely fired immediately upon coming out of the water (unless it's a SIG SAUER SIG M400 Series Tactical Rifle/Carbine variant, the only known exception) and must be cleaned and lubricated more frequently. DR still likes DGI ARs, but giving SOF a weapon system that will run reliably and safely in ALL combat environments (including waterborne environments) for extended periods with minimal cleaning and lubrication requirements and can give the operators some enhanced waterborne and adverse-conditions capabilities is probably a good idea, provided the weapon still achieves acceptable combat accuracy and durability. Issuing SOF and general infantry forces the same weapons platform and operating system is probably another good idea from a training, morale, and long-term cost standpoint.

So, while Defense Review previously speculated (back in early February, 2011) that a mid-length direct-gas-impingement (DGI) AR was the more likely way forward for the Army, it now appears that piston/op-rod operation is in the Army's 5.56mm future, and we're making an educated guess that the new weapon will be a piston AR. In that same piece, we also thought the M4/M4A1 Carbine upgrade/improvement program was the more realistic and likely survivor between the two programs/competitions, but we may be wrong there, too, if U.S. Army brass are saying that IC is much more likely to win. Time will tell.

Until then, DR will try to stay on top of this thing.

David Crane Running FN SCAR PDW at NDIA Infantry Small Arms Systems Symposium 2011 Range Day Shoot 12 The U.S. Armys Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op Rod Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine Type AR (AR 15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation? By the way, speaking of piston AR's, Heckler & Koch claims that the HK416 (also written HK 416) piston system design variant they're competing is "far improved", but the Colt Defense "Enhanced M4" design will be tough to beat. In the Army Times piece, Bacon wrote the following:

Do not confuse the Enhanced M4 with the M4A1. The weapon is suppression ready, has a fluted barrel for less weight and better cooling, and has shown “markedly better” accuracy than the current M4, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Internal mechanisms have also been changed to increase durability and reliability. Notably, Colt went with a piston system.

Colt Defense is also a U.S. company and has an excellent QC (Quality Control) record on the Colt M4/M4A1 Carbine.

The FN Mk16 SCAR-L (SCAR-Light), Adcor B.E.A.R. and Remington ACR (Adaptive Combat Rifle) 5.56 carbines are also reportedly still in the running, but in DR's opinion, are unlikely to win. We're guessing it will most likely come down to the Colt "Enhanced M4" and "far improved" HK416 variant.

Whichever design wins will have to run reliably and durably with a steady diet of M855A1 EPR (Enhanced Performance Round) "Green Ammo", which apparently currently utilizes a "filthy" type of ball powder. Each competing manufacturer was provided with 10,080 rounds (six cases worth) of M855A1 this spring in order to fine-tune their guns to operate reliably with it at high round count. This dirty aspect of the new ammo only reinforces DR's belief that a gas piston/op-rod carbine system (most likely an AR carbine system), is in the Army's future, rather than DGI operation.

Under "Secondary development tests", Bacon discusses enhanced weapon/ammo system lethality and sustained-fire-without-cookoff capability. He writes, "Incapacitation is key here as the weapons must score kills in as few shots as possible." This is basically just a continuation of his "Development tests" description in his July 9 2011 Military Times article titled "The Army sets its sights on its next carbine".

If the Army is serious about this, they'll at least consider adding the Ferfrans RRS/DSAS (Rate Reduction System/Delayed Sear Activation System) bolt carrier group (BCG) to the package to reduce the weapon's cyclic rate of fire (ROF) below the 700 RPM threshold, thus improving full-auto controllability, which will in turn increase the hits on target and lethality, and ultimately weapon durability/lifespan, since it will reduce heat and stress on the weapon during both semi-auto and full-auto firing.

If the Individual Carbine program makes it to the acquisition/procurement stage, three vendors will each produce a maximum of 178,890 carbines, for a total of 536,670 carbines.

Under "Limited user evaluation", Bacon writes about how co-ed teams of 16 soldiers will "determine each weapon’s probability and quality of hit, time of first trigger pull and mobility/portability in an operational environment. Tests will include short- and long-range engagements, as well as close-quarters battle. Stationary, multiple and moving targets out to 600 meters will be used. Target exposure times will vary by range from 1.5 to 8 seconds." Bacon first wrote about this in his aforementioned previous Military Times article.

If all goes as planned (and that's a big "if", right now), the Army will have itself a new carbine in approximately three years, and that carbine will most likely be a piston-driven AR.

© Copyright 2011 DefenseReview.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without receiving permission and providing proper credit and appropriate links.

Related Articles:

Smith & Wesson (S&W) M&P4 Enhanced/Improved M4/M4A1 Carbine-Type Tactical AR Carbine Pulled from U.S. Army Individual Carbine (IC) Competition (Photos!)

U.S. Army Issues New “Individual Carbine” Draft RFP (Request For Proposal): How will the Army’s Next Carbine Improve on the Colt M4/M4A1 Carbine, and will it still be an AR? DR has some ideas…

300 AAC Blackout (300BLK / 7.62x35mm) LVAW (Low-Visibility Assault Weapon) Honey Badger Suppressed Tactical AR (AR-15) SBR (Short Barreled Rifle)/Sub-Carbine Demo Video, and 300 BLK SIG516 (also written SIG 516) Heads-Up

DR Action Video! Colt Model P0923 APC (Advanced Piston Carbine) Fired on Full-Auto at the Range: Colt Piston-Driven AR Carbine/SBR on the Way

DR Action Video! Colt SCW (Sub-Compact Weapon) Personal Defense Weapon (PDW)-Type 5.56mm NATO AR SBR/Sub-Carbine Fired on Full-Auto at NDIA Range Day

DR Exclusive Video: HK416C (also written HK 416C) “Ultra Compact Assault Rifle” SBR/PDW (Short Barreled Rifle/Personal Defense Weapon) Fired on Full-Auto at NDIA Infantry Small Arms Systems Symposium 2011 Range Day Shoot

DR Exclusive Video: FN SCAR PDW (Personal Defense Weapon) Prototype 5.56mm NATO Assault SBR Fired on Full-Auto at NDIA Infantry Small Arms Systems Symposium 2011 Range Day Shoot!

DR Action Video! More FN SCAR PDW (Personal Defense Weapon) Prototype Live Fire Videos: Left-Side View Shows Reciprocating Charging Handle Cycling Back and Forth

FERFRANS Rate Reduction System/Delayed Sear Activation System (RRS/DSAS)-Equipped Adams Arms (AA) Tactical Piston AR SBR/Sub-Carbine Upper Receivers Mounted on Colt M4A1 Carbine Select-Fire Lower: Full-Auto/Semi-Auto Range Test on Video!

Falcon Security Group (FSG) Demonstrates FERFRANS HVLAR (High Volume Light Automatic Rifle) Lightweight Mag-Fed Infantry Automatic Rifle (IAR)-Type Piston/Op-Rod AR Carbine: Who needs an FN M249 SAW Belt-Fed Light Machine Gun? (Video!)

Videos: Controlled One-Handed 30-Round Full-Auto Mag Dump and Short Bursts with 5.56mm NATO Select-Fire FERFRANS SOAR Piston AR SBR/PDWs

Adcor Defense BEAR Gas Piston Rifle (GPR): Gas Piston/Op-Rod-Driven Tactical AR Rifle/Carbine/SBR with Forward Charging Handle and Free-Float Barrel (Video)

U.S. Army Begins Shipping M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (M855A1 EPR) a.k.a. “Green Ammo” Improved 5.56mm NATO Round to Warfighters: Green Tip M855 Ball Ammo Gets a Serious Upgrade

U.S. Army Issues Sources Sought Notice Requesting Information for “Individual Carbine” Small Arms Technology: The Quest for the “Next Carbine” to Upgrade/Improve and/or Replace the Colt M4/M4A1 Carbine Continues…

Remington ACR (Adaptive Combat Rifle) “Leaked” Promotional Video Demonstrates Weapon in a 21st-Century Combat Environment: MagPul Masada Rifle/Carbine Finally Making it to Market?

MagPul Masada Adaptive Combat Weapon System (ACWS) Makes Its Debut

Sources Sought: ‘Improved Carbine and Subcompact Individual Weapon System’

The U.S. Army’s Next Carbine: Hello Gas Piston/Op-Rod “Enhanced M4/M4A1 Carbine”-Type AR (AR-15), Goodbye Direct Gas Impingement (DGI) Operation? by
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link

About David Crane

David Crane started publishing online in 2001. Since that time, governments, military organizations, Special Operators (i.e. professional trigger pullers), agencies, and civilian tactical shooters the world over have come to depend on Defense Review as the authoritative source of news and information on "the latest and greatest" in the field of military defense and tactical technology and hardware, including tactical firearms, ammunition, equipment, gear, and training.

8 comments

  1. You point out that Colt is a US company.  HK Defense is a US company as well.

    • HK Defense is an American company as much as a Camry is an American car.

      • Funny you say that, as the Camry uses more American sourced parts than any other car on the road today, foreign or domestic. It’s also assembled here. At this point, no one should care where the Army sources a weapon system from. It should be all about finding the best system out there that delivers the most improvement. Even though the 416 is a great system, has a track record with SOF types already and shares commonality with the Marines’ IAR, the Colt CM901 looks like the best idea. If they can make it run reliably and shoot as straight as the pure 5.56 guns, the added flexibility of 7.62 would be a huge gain for guys in Afghanistan. 

      • You are correct dude, Colt is Americana not HK. Colt has been famous since the days of the Wild west. When one hears of HK one thinks of Germany not America. HK in America is a subsidiary of HK in Germany owned by Germans. Just like FN is owned by Belgians but they also have a factory here. Having manufacturing here in the U.S. makes it easier to by pass importation laws and in this case laws pertaining bidding in Gov contracts. Jama1979 is WRONG!

  2. Hello David, and  everyone…!

    I should point out that I have been an assiduous reader of this Blog, and have been intrigued by some patterns in reviewing:

    For starters, David, I have seen that you are competetly partial to ARs, no matter what better weapon is out there… In this article itself, you ‘conveniently forgot’ that the SCAR has the the decresed firing rate to 650-700 rpm  from the get-go (no add-on required), and that it is used by SOCOM both in the 5.56 and 7.62 variants, and also that it has been praised in various reviews everywhere on the Web. The biggest drwaback is the charging handle… well, you surely know that was demanded by SOCOM itself for better forward assist… Not that the SCAR needs it… It is a piston-system from the ground up (unlike the HK 416), and it precedes COLT’s CM901 in both the conversion kit to adapt the 7.62 platform to accomodate 5.56 caliber AND being used in the field already for a couple of years (experience completely non-existent in the COLT’s APC and CM901 platforms).

    So, my feeling is that you favor COLT, and that is ok: an American brand, made in the USA…Well, guess what, so is FNH-USA! It is a Belgian company, but it’s US Manufacturing facilities employ thousands of americans and most pistol and rifles sold by FNH on US soil are made and some even designed  in the USofA!

    So, my feeling is that though you, David, are very smart and don’t get me wrong, I always love to read about the millionth AR variant, truth is that you are a bit biased and protectionist when it comes to overall quality of firearms worldwide and domestically as well…

    I think that is the only quality lacking here, the journalistic impartiality that would better inform the readers about the great weapons out there… 

    I mean no disrespect, David, just thought you should know how it looks from where I’m standing…

    Don’t get me wrong, you are obviously entitled to your personal views, but given your status and the nature of this blog, the more impartial you are in your professional reviews, the more credibility they will garner… 

    Just my humble two-cents…. 

    Cheers!

  3. i dont care which one wins as long as its an american company

  4. I’m going for next gen and picking up a SCAR. I just don’t see myself wanting a piston slapped on a gun made fir DI like the M4. I don’t care where the winner’s HQ is located as long as it’s the best rifle available for our troops.

Leave a Reply