Thursday, October 19, 2017
Breaking News
Army Research Lab (ARL) developing Hardened Automonomous, Artificially-Intelligent (AI) Distributed Robot Swarms (or, Swarm Bots) for Future Electronic Warfare Environments: Will They be Ready and Capable for World War III (WWIII)?

Army Research Lab (ARL) developing Hardened Automonomous, Artificially-Intelligent (AI) Distributed Robot Swarms (or, Swarm Bots) for Future Electronic Warfare Environments: Will They be Ready and Capable for World War III (WWIII)?

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By David Crane
david (at) defensereview (dot) com

Image Credit: Lifeboat.com

July 21, 2017

DefenseReview (DR) has previously reported on the U.S. Deparment of Defense (DoD), DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and the U.S. Air Force developing (mostly) autonomous, artificially-intelligent (AI) ground robot, boat and UAS/UAV/drone aircraft swarm (or, swarming) technology for future warfare applications. Specifically, we reported on both Squad X Core Technologies (SXCT) and DIUx/Kratos UTAP-22 Mako and XQ-222 Valkyrie Combat UAS/UAV/Drone Aircraft, which really intrigued us. Anyway, not to be outdone, the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is currently engaging in an effort to “fund new efforts to develop battlefield communications and sensing networks that perform well against foes with advanced electronic warfare capabilities,” which is good news, and hints at a renewed focus on nation-state warfare against potential major military threats like China and Russia, who are reportedly doing the same on their end, or at least trying to do so.

Developing artificially intelligent and autonomous swarming-capable air and ground systems that can successfully survive electromagnetic attacks and thwart the enemy’s electronic jamming capabilities is no easy task, particularly when Russia’s “invested heavily in anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) technologies meant to keep U.S. forces out of certain areas,” according to Defense One. Defense One recently quoted the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) saying ““There are regions in Donbass where no electromagnetic communications—including radio, cell phone, and television—work,” and, “Electronic warfare is the single largest killer of Ukrainian systems by jamming either the controller or GPS signals.” Quite the challenge, but ARL director Philip Perconti appears to be on it. “When you don’t have bandwidth, when you’re under cyber attack, when you’re being jammed. That’s the problem we’re trying to address,” says Perconti.

Of course, as DR’s discussed before, keeping our own autonomous AI ground, sea and air robotic systems firmly under the U.S. military’s positive control will likely also prove challenging, as we obviously don’t want to end up with Skynet, and attack of the Terminator robots, all of a sudden. That’s why programs like Distribuited and Collaborative Intelligent Systems and Technology (DCIST) and the Internet of Battlefield Things (IBT) have us a little concerned. Basically, the U.S. military wants to give robotic systems larger “brains” and improved networking capability so they can function autonomously and effectively even if/when the enemy jams our radio communications, so we can’t communicate with our bots anymore. Hell, what could go wrong, there?

Let’s just hope the U.S. military at least has the maintaining-positive-control aspect of AI robotic warfare covered when we CAN communicate with our AI robotic warfighters.

According to Defense One, Perconti “expects ARL to announce contract awards for both programs later this year, allowing them to begin in earnest in fiscal 2018,” so things are really getting underway quickly.

Defense Review will continue to follow these programs as they develop and mature. Our primary concern is a future nation-state war against a combined Sino-Russian military force, and we’re curious to see how these robot swarms fit into that scenario.

Company/Organization Contact Info:

© Copyright 2017 DefenseReview.com (DR). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without receiving permission and providing proper credit and appropriate links. If you are reading this article anywhere other than DefenseReview.com, please email us the website address/URL (where the unauthorized DR article reprint is located) at defrev (at) gmail (dot) com. Thank you.

Related Articles:

DIUx/Kratos UTAP-22 Mako and XQ-222 Valkyrie Combat UAS/UAV/Drone Aircraft: Developmental Artificially Intelligent (AI)Attack Aircraft Wingmen on Their Way for Future Warfare!

Russian Robot Soldiers and Drone Swarms: Science Fact or Fiction? Meet FEDOR, Vikhr (‘Whirlwind’) and Smerch!

Xendurance Extreme Endurance Athletic Performance Enhancing Nutrition Supplements: Can it Help Turn Future Soldiers into Super Soldiers?
Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) + FlyBoard Air Ducted-Fan Hoverboard = Flying Super Soldiers: Future Military Special Operations Forces (SOF) Assaulters/Operators to Fly Themselves to the Target in Exo-Armor ‘Iron Man’-Type Combat Suits?

USSOCOM Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) Exo-Armor Combat Suit for the Future Soldier/Warfighter: ‘Iron Man’, or Future Iron Thud on the U.S. Military Procurement Scrap Heap?

Russian Ratnik-3 (Warrior-3) Infantry Combat System with Exoskeleton to Turn Future Russian Military Infantry Soldier/Warfighters into ‘Supermen’? Let’s Hope Not.

Korean Method-2 Giant Manned Bipedal Robot (GMBR) Exo-Bionic Exoskeleton for Future Warfare: Future Soldier/Warfighter Going ‘Avatar’-Style with Armored, Armed/Weaponized and Camouflaged Variant?

Rise of the Robot Soldier and Squad X Core Technologies (SXCT): ‘Terminator’-Like Artificially-Intelligent (AI) Cybersoldiers and Drone and Boat Swarms to Augment Infantry Warfighters with Total, Multi-Perspective 3D Battlefield Awareness, or just Kill all of Us?

Will AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Super-Intelligent Robot Soldiers Save Us, or Kill Us?

Will TALOS (Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit)-Outfitted Future Soldiers Get Lightweight Abalone Shell-Based Flexible Scalar Biomimetic Metal Foam, Carbyne (Linear Acetylenic Carbon) and/or Multilayer Graphene Ballistic Armor Composites?

Prox Dynamics PD-100 BLACK HORNET PRS (Personal Reconnaissance System) Micro Helicopter Drone: Palm-Sized ‘Nano UAS’ Provides Cargo Pocket ISR Capability for Infantry Recon Ops! (Video!)

DR Exclusive Interview!: HyperStealth Quantum Stealth (QS) Light-Bending Passive Adaptive Camouflage (Camo)/Visual Cloaking Technology for the 21st Century Future Soldier/Warfighter: Beyond SMARTCAMO Color-Changing Hybrid Camouflage, Beyond Fictional Alien Predator’s Active Electro-Optical Camouflage/Invisibility Cloaking Tech!

Russian Nano-Armor Coming in 2015 for Future Soldier ‘Warrior Suit’, and Russian Spetsnaz (Military Special Forces) Already Running Improved 6B43 Composite Hard Armor Plates, New Plate Carriers and Combat Helmets, AK Rifle/Carbines, GM-94 Grenade Launchers and other Tactical Gear in Crimea, Ukraine

AAI Lightweight Small Arms Technologies (LSAT) Prototype on Display at AUSA

Army Research Lab (ARL) developing Hardened Automonomous, Artificially-Intelligent (AI) Distributed Robot Swarms (or, Swarm Bots) for Future Electronic Warfare Environments: Will They be Ready and Capable for World War III (WWIII)? by
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link

About David Crane

David Crane started publishing online in 2001. Since that time, governments, military organizations, Special Operators (i.e. professional trigger pullers), agencies, and civilian tactical shooters the world over have come to depend on Defense Review as the authoritative source of news and information on "the latest and greatest" in the field of military defense and tactical technology and hardware, including tactical firearms, ammunition, equipment, gear, and training.